tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17391211.post3875251398352267054..comments2023-10-02T04:16:11.219-05:00Comments on never been here before: Obama on Faithstephaniehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14760765831975016535noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17391211.post-20742956491904094242008-04-30T13:06:00.000-05:002008-04-30T13:06:00.000-05:00"Scott - to answer your questions - he straight up..."Scott - to answer your questions - he straight up says "I believe in evolution." Then he goes on to say that faith and science both have truths, but that faith has truth that cannot be scientifically proven."<BR/><BR/>So here's the thing, I believe that. Evolution as an observable phenomena is true. And you can't prove God scientifically. Would you say that makes me interesting too? ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17391211.post-2338341722574541052008-04-22T18:38:00.000-05:002008-04-22T18:38:00.000-05:00Thanks :)Scott - to answer your questions - he str...Thanks :)<BR/><BR/>Scott - to answer your questions - he straight up says "I believe in evolution." Then he goes on to say that faith and science both have truths, but that faith has truth that cannot be scientifically proven.<BR/><BR/>As the the inerrancy of scripture, I'm not entirely sure of which camp he would fall into, but when is talking about scripture he never talks about the translation as the issue. He references it in a "that may have been true then, but it's not true now." sort of way.stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14760765831975016535noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17391211.post-12030639595686192572008-04-21T14:49:00.000-05:002008-04-21T14:49:00.000-05:00Some good thoughts. I tried reading it and found ...Some good thoughts. I tried reading it and found it quite interesting, but I have a problem reading just about all non-fiction so I didn't finish it.<BR/><BR/>I'm defintely in the Obama camp (and also a Christian). <BR/><BR/>FWIW, I don't think that all of the Bible should be read literally. I am also not a young earth creationist perhaps as a result. Is he not a creationist at all or is he an old earther or can you tell? I think I agree about faith vs reason but would need to read more. And re: the inerrancy issue I suppse that too would depend on how you define that. We don't have a perfect copy of God's word. I do believe that the Bible is God breathed and the ultimate meaning is protected, but not each individual word.<BR/><BR/>On that note you should <A HREF="http://q-and-a-blog.blogspot.com/search/label/King%20James%20Only%20-%20TR1" REL="nofollow">check this out</A>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17391211.post-57556117289582918102008-04-20T10:49:00.000-05:002008-04-20T10:49:00.000-05:00I found your post here through Kansas Bob's blog. ...I found your post here through Kansas Bob's blog. Great post; I've got Audacity in my to-read stack; definitely will pay close attention to the areas you've noted here. Thanks!NoVA Dadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16661990626635939447noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17391211.post-37230287594807447542008-04-19T11:46:00.000-05:002008-04-19T11:46:00.000-05:00Great job Stephanie! I linked here and quoted your...Great job Stephanie! I linked here and quoted your points.kc bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17440862813109808755noreply@blogger.com